Results

Numbers a bursar can defend in a board meeting.

I'd rather show you one result with the full context behind it than a wall of logos with no detail. Here's the one I can talk about in specifics, and what changed in the accounts I can't name publicly yet.

Higher Education
Named Client

Alphacrucis University College

Alphacrucis came to the table with a paid media programme that was spending steadily without the enrolment numbers to match. The diagnosis wasn't "spend more" — it was that a meaningful share of the budget was buying clicks from people who were never in a position to enrol: wrong course intent, wrong geography, wrong stage of the decision entirely.

Rebuilding the campaign structure around Alphacrucis' actual intake cycles, separating CSP-eligible from full-fee intent, and rewriting the funnel so it stopped treating every visitor identically produced two numbers I'm genuinely proud to put a name next to:

  • 66% reduction in cost-per-click — achieved by cutting the spend that was never going to convert, not by lowering bids across the board and accepting worse placement.
  • 360% lift in conversion rate — on the same underlying funnel, once it was rebuilt around how a prospective Alphacrucis student actually makes the decision to enrol.

These are the two numbers I'll happily walk through in detail, methodology included, on a call — not just quote at you.

Before → After

What actually changed

MetricBeforeAfter
Cost per clickBaseline↓ 66%
Funnel conversion rateBaseline↑ 360%
Campaign structureSingle blended funnelSegmented by intake type & intent
Newer engagements

Two more institutions came on board on the strength of that result.

Both are recent enough, and under naming arrangements specific enough, that I'm not putting logos on this page yet — but the shape of the work is worth describing, because it's the clearest evidence that the Alphacrucis result wasn't a one-off.

Independent Schooling

A national, multi-campus college group

A multi-campus independent college group, structurally similar to Alphacrucis in that enrolment decisions get made at both a national brand level and a local campus level. The early work here is the same diagnostic process that started the Alphacrucis engagement: mapping where reporting is masking underperformance before touching a single campaign.

International Education

A globally recognised test-prep and admissions brand

A different funnel shape entirely — exam-date urgency, agent-network referrals, and a genuinely international, multi-market audience. This engagement is the first real test of whether the underlying methodology holds outside a purely higher-ed context, and early signs say it does.

What ties them together

Same underlying problem, different sector

Compliance-bound, multi-stakeholder, long-consideration-window enrolment decisions. Higher ed, independent schooling, and international test-prep look like three industries. They're the same marketing problem wearing three different uniforms.

Want the full methodology behind the Alphacrucis numbers?

I'll walk you through exactly what changed, in enough detail that you could (in theory) go build it yourself. Most people would rather I just build it for their institution instead.

Book a conversation